How to critically analyse research results and conclusions
The table below provides the criteria for judging the strengths and weaknesses of research results and conclusions:
appropriate choice and use of statistics
correct interpretation of results
all results explained
alternative explanations considered
significance of all results discussed
consistency of results with previous research discussed
results add to existing understanding or knowledge
limitations discussed
results clearly explained
conclusions consistent with results
Evaluating the Results and Conclusions
Strengths Weaknesses
Chose and used appropriate statistics inappropriate choice or use of statistics
Results interpreted correctly or accurately incorrect interpretation of results
the results have been over-interpreted
For example: correlation measures have been incorrectly interpreted to suggest causation rather than association
All results were explained, including inconsistent or misleading results inconsistent or misleading results not explained
Alternative explanations for results were considered unbalanced explanations: alternative explanations for results not explored
Significance of all results were considered incomplete consideration of results
Results considered according to consistency with other research or viewpoints
Results are conclusive because they have been replicated by other studies consistency of results with other research not considered
results are suggestive rather than conclusive because they have not been replicated by other studies
Results add significantly to existing understanding or knowledge results do not significantly add to existing understanding knowledge
Limitations of the research design or method are acknowledged limitations of the research design or method not considered
Results were clearly explained, sufficiently detailed, consistent results were unclear, insufficiently detailed, inconsistent, confusing, ambiguous, contradictory
Conclusions were consistent with and supported by the results conclusions were not consistent with or not supported by the results
Welcome to 'Developing Research and Analytical Skills' (COM151)! Melissa Schroder All Sections No unread replies.No replies. My name is Melissa Schroder. I am the Course Convenor and tutor for Developing Research and Analytical Skills (COM151) and along with Stephanie Burdett, I will be the main point of contact for you for this Unit. We are here to assist you with all your unit related questions regarding the week-by-week modules, content and assessments. About Ms. Melissa Schroder (Course Convenor & Tutor) myphoto2022.jpg My background is in Education and Linguistics. For the past 20 years I have been teaching academic skills (reading, writing, research and study skills) to undergraduate and postgraduate students. I enjoy working with students and helping them make sense of the university world. I welcome any questions you have about what you are reading and learning. Please make use of the discussion board so that others can also benefit from your questions. em...
Comments
Post a Comment