How to critically analyse a theory, model or framework
The evaluative words used most often to refer to theory, model or framework are a sound theory or a strong theory.
The table below summarizes the criteria for judging the strengths and weaknesses of a theory:
comprehensive
clear
logical
practical
applicable
empirically supported
up-to-date
parsimonious
Evaluating a Theory, Model or Framework
The table below lists the criteria for the strengths and their corresponding weaknesses that are usually considered in a theory.
Strengths Weaknesses
Comprehensively accounts for main phenomena overlooks or omits important features or concepts
Clear, detailed vague, unexplained, ill-defined, misconceived
Main tenets or concepts are logical and consistent concepts or tenets are inconsistent or contradictory
Practical, useful impractical, unuseful
Applicable across a range of settings, contexts, groups and conditions limited or narrow applicability
Empirically supported by a large body of evidence
propositions and predictions are supported by evidence supported by small or no body of evidence
insufficient empirical support for the propositions and predictions
Up-to-date, accounts for new developments outdated
Parsimonius (not excessive): simple, clear, with few variables excessive, overly complex or complicated
Critical analysis examples of theories
The following sentences are examples of the phrases used to explain strengths and weaknesses.
Smith’s (2005) theory appears up to date, practical and applicable across many divergent settings.
Brown’s (2010) theory, although parsimonious and logical, lacks a sufficient body of evidence to support its propositions and predictions
Little scientific evidence has been presented to support the premises of this theory.
One of the limitations with this theory is that it does not explain why…
A significant strength of this model is that it takes into account …
The propositions of this model appear unambiguous and logical.
A key problem with this framework is the conceptual inconsistency between ….
Welcome to 'Developing Research and Analytical Skills' (COM151)! Melissa Schroder All Sections No unread replies.No replies. My name is Melissa Schroder. I am the Course Convenor and tutor for Developing Research and Analytical Skills (COM151) and along with Stephanie Burdett, I will be the main point of contact for you for this Unit. We are here to assist you with all your unit related questions regarding the week-by-week modules, content and assessments. About Ms. Melissa Schroder (Course Convenor & Tutor) myphoto2022.jpg My background is in Education and Linguistics. For the past 20 years I have been teaching academic skills (reading, writing, research and study skills) to undergraduate and postgraduate students. I enjoy working with students and helping them make sense of the university world. I welcome any questions you have about what you are reading and learning. Please make use of the discussion board so that others can also benefit from your questions. em...
Comments
Post a Comment